ReviewPharmaceutical biology2026
Therapeutic potential of
Review in Pharmaceutical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for the management of gastric post-endoscopic submucosal dissection ulcers and preventing delayed bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Study on the Preparation of a Photo-Responsive Hydrogel Loaded with Berberine-Asiaticoside Cocrystal and Its Therapeutic Effect on Infected Wounds.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers but is often complicated by delayed healing and stenosis. Current therapies like proton pump inhibitors primarily suppress acid without actively promoting mucosal regeneration.
objectiveThis review evaluates the therapeutic potential of AS for ESD-induced wound healing, focusing on its pharmacological mechanisms and emerging delivery strategies.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Relevant
resultsAS accelerates healing through multifaceted mechanisms: it exerts anti-inflammatory effects
conclusionAS offers a promising therapeutic evolution, moving from reliance on passive acid suppression toward a synergistic model that integrates acid control with active mucosal regeneration for ESD management. Future research should focus on optimizing endoscope-compatible delivery platforms to facilitate clinical translation and reduce postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.