Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866900›Full record

ReviewCroatian medical journal2026

Ancient DNA studies performed in the forensic genetic laboratory in Slovenia: a narrative review.

Irena Zupanič Pajnič

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Croatian medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Irena Zupanič PajničIrena Zupanič Pajnič, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, irena.zupanic@mf.uni-lj.si.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient DNA research is typically conducted in dedicated clean-room facilities; however, recent work in Slovenia has demonstrated that standard forensic technologies can also be successfully applied to archaeological remains. This article reviews studies conducted by our group on skeletal samples from different Slovenian sites. Comparative analyses of petrous bones from two archaeological contexts revealed how environmental conditions affect DNA preservation. Long-term storage effects were assessed by comparing freshly excavated remains with samples stored for 12 years under unregulated museum conditions. Intra-skeletal variability was examined through petrous bones, femurs, tali, calcanei, patellae, and teeth, and the potential of tooth cementum for minimally destructive extraction was evaluated. Differences in DNA quality between adult and non-adult skeletons were investigated. Genetic sexing was performed on 83 subadult skeletons to test the reliability of morphological methods, which often fail at this age. For optimized analyses, a DNA extraction protocol was developed that requires minimal bone powder. The PowerQuant real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system proved a cost-effective predictor of successful short tandem repeat (STR) typing in degraded remains. Kinship studies, including that of four individuals from the 5th-6th century, demonstrated the utility of combining STR, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and PCR-based massive parallel sequencing approaches, which improved statistical power and confirmed relatedness. Additionally, eye and hair color were predicted for skeletons dated to the 3rd-18th centuries. Overall, these results highlight that combining conventional forensic approaches with strict contamination control can generate reliable genetic data from archaeological samples and offer valuable insights into past populations.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientDNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsSloveniaDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID41866900
PMCPMC13014292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.