Trial reportPalliative medicine2026
A randomized controlled clinical trial of intranasal versus subcutaneous midazolam for agitation in terminal illness (MinTU study).
Trial report in Palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTerminally ill patients often have difficulty taking medications. Suitable, minimally invasive, fast-acting administration routes are particularly important. Trials on alternative drug administration routes in palliative care are essential to base therapy decisions on evidence rather than experience.
aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of intranasal compared with subcutaneous midazolam for the initial management of terminal agitation in palliative care patients.
designRandomized, investigator-initiated open-label phase-II trial, August 2022-July 2024. SETTING/
participantsMonocentric trial at the palliative care ward of a German University Hospital. 180 patients were assessed for suitability, 60 patients (median age, 68 years (SD 12.3), 26 female) were randomized 1:1 and analyzed. Patients with terminal agitation fulfilling all eligibility criteria were randomized to midazolam 5 mg administered either intranasal ( PRIMARY OUTCOME: Improvement of terminal agitation by midazolam administration assessed by RASS-PAL-score. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Midazolam plasma concentrations after administration.
resultsMedian RASS-PAL-scores decreased significantly in both groups. Intranasal group: 2 at baseline, to -1 at 5 min and -2 at 20 min. Subcutaneous group: 1,-0 and -1. Within-group reductions exceeded the clinically relevant threshold of ⩾ 1 point at 5 and 20 min (all
conclusionMidazolam intranasal administration was effective in reducing terminal agitation and achieves higher plasma concentrations compared to subcutaneous administration. It is an alternative route of application to improve end-of-life care for terminally ill patients.
trial registrationMinTU Study 173-01, Eudra CT No.: 2021-004789-36, DRKS ID: 00026775 (07.07.2022, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00026775).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.