ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Association of Protocol Design-Related Factors With Enrollment Duration in Clinical Trials.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient enrollment is a critical factor in the success of clinical trials; however, many trials fail to recruit participants within a planned timeline. Protocol design is a key barrier to efficient recruitment. However, few studies have quantitatively evaluated the association between protocol design and enrollment duration across various disease areas and time periods. We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from ClinicalTrials.gov and another related database. Industry-sponsored phase 2 and 3 drug trials completed between January 2017 and September 2024 were included. Key variables related to the protocol design were extracted from trial protocols and database entries. The enrollment duration was estimated using the trial start dates, primary completion dates, and outcome time frames. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with enrollment duration, including comparisons between the pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic periods. In total, 1286 trials met the inclusion criteria. Multiple linear regression identified three variables significantly associated with a longer enrollment duration: number of original enrollments (p = 0.023), number of inclusion criteria (p < 0.001), and days of assessment (p = 0.013). Before the pandemic, the number of assessment days was the primary factor, while after the pandemic, the number of inclusion criteria had the strongest association. This study demonstrated that the enrollment duration was significantly influenced by protocol design features. To improve recruitment efficiency, careful consideration of the inclusion criteria, assessment burden, and enrollment targets is essential during trial planning. Causal relationships should be interpreted cautiously and further examined in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.