ReviewSeminars in vascular surgery2026
Novel radiation-sparing imaging techniques in transcarotid stenting.
Review in Seminars in vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcarotid artery revascularization is increasingly prevalent, but relies on fluoroscopic guidance for placement of carotid stents. With increasing awareness about the hazards of radiation exposure, we aimed to explore the prior literature regarding alternative and adjunct imaging methods in carotid stenting. These have included fusion with preoperative computed tomography angiography, fully contrast-sparing procedures with preoperative magnetic resonance angiography and fusion using plain fluoroscopy, and ultrasound-assisted transfemoral carotid stenting. All methods demonstrated excellent technical results but have achieved very limited adoption. We also reviewed literature on the use of ultrasound-guided stent and device deployment in other vascular beds, including inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, endovascular aneurysm repair, and peripheral arterial stenting, suggesting that ultrasound is a feasible method for intraoperative guidance. However, with lack of widespread adoption, further modifications may be required to improve usability in the operative setting. Finally, our group explored a novel frontier in ultrasound-guided transcarotid stenting, using preoperative computed tomography angiography imaging in conjunction with live ultrasound imaging. Fusion of the live and preoperative imaging allows the user to see the exact location of their ultrasound imaging plane superimposed on a 3-dimensional model of the carotid, taking significant uncertainty out of real-time ultrasound imaging. This novel registration technology may significantly improve the ability of surgeons to use ultrasound in the deployment of carotid stents, thereby reducing radiation exposure in the procedure. In addition, the same technology may be extrapolated to other areas of vascular pathology in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.