ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
The beneficial effects of clazosentan on the perioperative management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective clazosentan has been approved in Japan for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and has contributed to the significant suppression of angiographic vasospasm in clinical practice. We herein report the beneficial effects of clazosentan on the perioperative management of patients with aSAH. Methods The study population comprised 102 consecutive patients with aSAH: 49 received conventional treatment (fasudil with triple-H therapy) before May 2022, and 53 were treated with the current protocol (clazosentan management) thereafter. The factors associated with vasospasm and perioperative management, as well as the implementation status of postoperative rehabilitation, hospitalization and outcomes at discharge were compared. Results the prevalence of angiographic vasospasm was significantly lower in the clazosentan group than in the fasudil group (32.1% vs. 59.2%, p < 0.01). Although the incidence of vasospasm-related DCI and favorable outcomes at discharge tended to be better in the clazosentan group, these differences were not statistically significant. Despite equivalent timing of rehabilitation initiation, sitting training and physiotherapy in the training room were initiated significantly earlier in the clazosentan group than in the fasudil group (6.5 days vs. 10.7 days, p < 0.01; 11.8 days vs. 16.1 days, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the clazosentan group than in the fasudil group (22.3 days vs. 29.6 days, p < 0.01). Conclusion clazosentan-based management was associated with reduced angiographic vasospasm, earlier rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization compared with fasudil-based management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41866641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.