ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Research progresses on FLASH radiotherapy and its application for the treatment of digestive system tumors.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decades, advances in technique have turned radiotherapy into a precise and effective modality for cancer treatment. Nevertheless, the biological effect on organs surrounding the tumor target area is a main dose-limiting element in radiotherapy, e.g., doses are restricted by lethal intestinal tissue toxicity for many pelvic or abdominal cancer radiotherapy. Consequently, minimizing the damage to normal tissues has become a focal point in radiotherapy research. Recently, ionizing radiation delivered at ultra-high dose rates (also termed FLASH-RT) has emerged in the field. Preclinical studies in a variety of animal models have shown that FLASH-RT can control tumors while minimizing normal tissue toxicity compared to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT), which broadens the therapeutic window of radiotherapy. In this review, we summarize the present speculations on the biological mechanisms underlying the FLASH effects, including oxygen depletion hypothesis, mitochondria hypothesis, genome stability hypothesis, immunomodulation hypothesis, and so on. Furthermore, we summarize the main data supporting the clinical translation of FLASH-RT, and discuss its relevance and applicability in the treatment of digestive system tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.