ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
The importance of procedural indication in predicting operative time for elective robotic colon surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of operative time in robotic surgery is essential for efficient operating room scheduling and resource utilization. Most current estimation methods rely primarily on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, which do not account for the clinical indication that could influence surgical complexity. We assessed if surgical indication independently contributes to variation in operative duration for robotic colon procedures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ACS-NSQIP from 2018 to 2023 of adults undergoing elective robotic colectomy. Cases were limited to the four most common CPT codes and four most common surgical indications: colon cancer, benign neoplasm, uncomplicated diverticulitis, and complicated diverticulitis. Operative time, defined as minutes from incision to closure, was compared across indications within each CPT category. Multivariable linear regression adjusting for demographic and clinical factors assessed whether indication independently predicted operative duration. Results: Among 29,090 cases, median operative time differed significantly across indications within every CPT category. Cancer and complicated diverticulitis were consistently associated with the longest operative durations (292.0 min, 283.0 min), while benign neoplasm had the shortest (172.0 min). In adjusted models, indication remained an independent predictor of operative time, adding up to 43 min depending on CPT and indication (β:42.77 min, 95%CI:36.14–49.40 min, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Surgical indication significantly influences operative time in robotic colon surgery beyond the information captured by CPT codes. Incorporating diagnosis-specific data into time estimation models may improve operating room scheduling accuracy and overall resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41866630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.