Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866617›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Acute oncology hospital care at home for post-chemotherapy monitoring.

Melanie W Kier, Elena Baldwin, Tuyet-Trinh Truong, Tianxiang Sheng, Marcio A Diniz, Jamie H Port, Albert L Siu, Cardinale B Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melanie W KierDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. melanie.kier@mountsinai.org.
Elena BaldwinDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Tuyet-Trinh TruongDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Tianxiang ShengDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Marcio A DinizDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jamie H PortCenter for Molecular Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Albert L SiuBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine and the VA GRECC, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Cardinale B SmithDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHospitalization at home (HaH) has demonstrated clinical efficacy and improved patient experience in general medicine inpatients. We conducted a quasi-experimental design study of our institution's experience with HaH among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received chemotherapy in the hospital and continued their hospitalization at home to complete the rest of their care.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with MM who received chemotherapy with dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with or without bortezomib (DCEP ± V) in the hospital and then continued their hospitalization at home from September 2020 to May 2023. The control cohort was all patients with MM who received DCEP ± V and lived in a zip code excluded from HaH's catchment area. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), 30-day hospital readmissions, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted from the electronic health record. Primary endpoints were 30-day hospital readmissions and 30-day ER visits. We hypothesized that the HaH cohort was non-inferior to the control cohort.

resultsWe identified 24 HaH episodes of care and 62 in the control cohort. Patients enrolled in HaH were younger and more racially diverse. The HaH cohort had a mean total LOS, both hospital plus HaH LOS, of 16 (SD = 4.5) vs. 19.2 (SD = 11.9) days in the control (p = 0.198). Mean HaH LOS was 8.7 days (SD = 3.9), with 208.8 inpatient-bed days saved. Thirty-day hospital admissions as defined by CMS were 0% vs 1.6% in the HaH and control cohort, respectively; the 30-day ER visits had an odds ratio of 1.07 (95% CI = 0.91, 1.26), indicating non-inferiority. Successful HaH admissions occurred for 92% (95% CI = 80.6%, 100%) of care episodes.

conclusionSuccessful HaH admissions occurred for 92% of care episodes and provided significant hospital bed days saved. HaH demonstrated non-inferiority for healthcare utilization compared to standard inpatient monitoring, showcasing its potential to optimize resource utilization among this cohort of patients with MM receiving inpatient chemotherapy. These findings support the integration of HaH programs into oncology care and further studies are warranted to expand and refine HaH implementation in this population.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHome Care ServicesHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospitalizationMultiple MyelomaAgedAntineoplastic AgentsEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyHospitalization at homeInpatient

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.