ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Comparative Genomic Analysis of Latilactobacillus curvatus: Insights into Adaptive Evolution and Niche-Specific Traits.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Latilactobacillus curvatus is of considerable industrial relevance, especially in the food sector, owing to its extensive distribution, multifunctional capabilities, and beneficial probiotic properties. This study undertook a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis by sequencing and assembling seven novel L. curvatus genomes and subsequently integrating these with publicly 75 genomes from the NCBI database. The results demonstrated that L. curvatus possesses a closed pangenome structure, indicating substantial environmental and genetic adaptability of this species. Phylogenetic analyses of 1,022 core genes revealed that L. curvatus was divided into three distinct clades (A, B1, and B2), with a clear clustering pattern correlated with the isolation sources. Notably, dairy isolates exhibited significantly larger genome sizes and a higher number of CDS but lower GC content. Moreover, dairy isolates had an elevated copy number of the GH35 gene family, which is crucial for lactose and galactose metabolism, thereby enhancing their adaptation to lactose-rich environments. Additionally, bacteriocin-producing gene clusters were identified in 27 isolates, with meat-derived isolates presenting the highest proportion (37.03%) and fecal isolates the lowest (7.41%), reflecting a niche-specific ecological adaptation. This study elucidates the key genomic features and adaptation mechanisms of L. curvatus, offering valuable theoretical insights into harnessing its probiotic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41866602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.