Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866588›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Variance-calibrated cross-individual bootstrapping for small-sample neuroscience.

Ismail Uyanik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ismail UyanikDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey. uyanik@ee.hacettepe.edu.tr.

Funding

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) 123E155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small sample sizes are a pervasive limitation in experimental neuroscience and related biological fields, frequently compromising statistical power and the reliability of inference. Conventional resampling techniques, such as stratified or hierarchical bootstrapping, often fail to balance coverage accuracy with interval precision, particularly when data are skewed or violate strict exchangeability assumptions. Here, we introduce Variance-Calibrated Cross-Individual Bootstrapping (CIB-VC), a robust resampling framework designed for datasets characterized by few subjects but distinct within-subject trial structures. The method constructs synthetic individuals by recombining trials across subjects to maximize informational use, coupled with a variance calibration step that restores empirical between-subject variability. Using extensive Monte Carlo simulations across Gaussian, heavy-tailed, and lognormal distributions, we demonstrate that CIB-VC consistently achieves near-nominal 95% coverage. In contrast, stratified bootstrapping exhibits severe under-coverage under distributional skew (coverage [Formula: see text]), while hierarchical bootstrapping yields overly conservative confidence intervals. Crucially, empirical validation on behavioral tracking data from weakly electric fish ([Formula: see text]) confirmed the practical utility of the method: CIB-VC produced confidence intervals approximately 23% narrower than standard hierarchical bootstrapping without introducing bias. By providing a statistically principled solution that preserves Type-I error control without sacrificing power, CIB-VC offers a practical tool for improving reproducibility in studies where increasing the number of subjects is ethically or logistically constrained.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesAnimalsCalibrationComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeComputational neuroscienceHierarchical dataReproducibilityResampling methodsSmall sample sizeStatistical power

Identifiers

PMID41866588
PMCPMC13149521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.