ArticleScientific reports2026
Elucidation of the process of delayed colonic perforation after endoscopic thermal injury in a rat model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delayed perforation is a rare but serious complication following endoscopic resection of colonic lesions; however, its pathogenesis remains unclear. We hypothesized that its mechanism mirrors Jackson's burn model, where a zone of stasis progresses to a zone of coagulation, ultimately leading to perforation. In this study, thermal injury was endoscopically induced in rat colons, and histopathological changes were analyzed at 12-hour intervals. To assess the role of bacterial infection, pseudo-germ-free rats were established by administering a course of antibiotics. The incidence of delayed colonic perforation was compared between the control and pseudo-germ-free rats. Degeneration and thinning of the muscularis propria persisted for 36 hours post-injury, with destruction of this layer observed at 48 hours. Dilated vessels in the mucosa and submucosa peaked at 24 hours, forming a zone of stasis. By 36 hours, mucosal necrosis had intensified, myeloperoxidase-positive cells had increased in the submucosa, and Escherichia coli had translocated into deeper layers, coinciding with expansion of the zone of coagulation. Moreover, pseudo-germ-free rats exhibited significantly fewer perforations. These findings suggest that delayed colonic perforation follows a pathological process similar to thermal burns and that bacterial infection accelerates this progression. Therefore, local infection control may be essential for preventing this serious complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.