Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866562›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Development and evaluation of an assay for the detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus RNA via real-time PCR with reverse transcription.

Alena Sharova, Marina Safonova, Anna Dolgova, Anna Shabalina, Margarita Popova, Tatiana Arbuzova, Svetlana Schirobokova, Anna Gladkikh, Dmitry Naydenov, Valeriya Sbarzaglia and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alena SharovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia. alenasharova21@gmail.com.
Marina SafonovaAnti-Plague Center, Federal Service on Consumers' Rights Protection and Human Well-Being Surveillance, Moscow, Russia.
Anna DolgovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anna ShabalinaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Margarita PopovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatiana ArbuzovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Svetlana SchirobokovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anna GladkikhSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitry NaydenovSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Valeriya SbarzagliaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ekaterina KlyuchnikovaSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ivan KholodilovChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune and Biological Products of the RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), Moscow, Russia.
Galina KarganovaChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune and Biological Products of the RAS (Institute of Poliomyelitis), Moscow, Russia.
Edward RamsaySaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Vladimir DedkovSaint Petersburg Pasteur Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

RSF 24-45-20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV, Orthoflavivirus encephalitidis) is an arbovirus of the family Flaviviridae. It is the etiological agent of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), a severe disease affecting the central nervous system. Among arboviral infections, TBE represents the greatest burden in northern Eurasia, both in terms of emerging infection risk and mortality. Globalization and climate change increase the risk of TBEV introduction into nonendemic countries. They may also lead to the emergence of new viral variants featuring increased virulence for humans or altered antigenic characteristics. Hence, sensitive and specific TBEV detection methods are needed not only for diagnostics but also for One Health approach goals (surveillance and identification of viral sources in the environment).

methodsHere, we describe a newly developed reverse transcription PCR (RT‒PCR) assay for TBEV detection. The assay was developed and evaluated using armored RNA positive control particles (ARCs). The assay was evaluated using several sample types: (1) a panel of heterologous viral and bacterial RNA/DNA; (2) RNA from TBEV strains isolated in different years in various Russian regions; and (3) RNA from TBEV-positive and TBEV-negative ticks (collected in northwest Russia).

resultsThe limit of detection (LOD) of the assay is 10

conclusionsThe results indicate that the developed RT‒PCR assay is a reliable and competitive method for the detection of TBEV RNA, which establishes its value as a tool for diagnosing and monitoring the virus.

Indexed as

Encephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralAnimalsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, ViralOrthoflavivirus encephalitidisRT‒PCRRussiaTBEVTick-borne encephalitis virus

Identifiers

PMID41866562
PMCPMC13130820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.