Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866509›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Encouraging positive psychology among adults with physical disabilities through caregiver collaboration: a community-based quasi-experimental study.

Ammaret Netasit, Charunrak Punyamoonwongsa, Chatsuda Mata, Piyathorn Rengrew, Apiradee Jeenkram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ammaret NetasitDepartment of Education Psychology and Guidance, Faculty of Education, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang Province, Thailand.
Charunrak PunyamoonwongsaDepartment of Education Psychology and Guidance, Faculty of Education, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang Province, Thailand.
Chatsuda MataDepartment of Community Public Health, Faculty of Science, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang Province, Thailand. chatsuda@g.lpru.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-804X
Piyathorn RengrewDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang Province, Thailand.
Apiradee JeenkramDepartment of English Education, Faculty of Education, Lampang Rajabhat University, Lampang Province, Thailand.

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation 193618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with physical disabilities often experience limited opportunities for psychological well-being, as support services tend to prioritize medical rehabilitation over strengths-based approaches. Although positive psychology interventions (PPIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing well-being, their application in disability care, particularly with systematic caregiver involvement, remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a community-based positive psychology intervention that actively engaged caregivers as co-facilitators to enhance psychological capital among adults with physical disabilities.

methodsA one-group quasi-experimental design with repeated measurements at three time points was conducted among 30 adults with physical disabilities and their primary caregivers in a rural community in Thailand. The intervention, titled “Positive Psychology Enhances Value and Self-Reliance,” comprised eight structured, interactive sessions grounded in psychological capital theory, targeting self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience. Caregivers were trained as co-facilitators to reinforce learning during and beyond program sessions. Quantitative outcomes were assessed using a validated positive psychology scale and analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA. Qualitative data was collected through structured observations and focus group discussions.

resultsThe program was associated with improvements across all domains of positive psychology. Mean overall positive psychology scores increased from baseline (M = 2.99) to immediately post-intervention (M = 4.41 on a 5-point scale) and remained higher at the one-month follow-up (M = 4.13). Repeated measures ANOVA indicated significant differences across time points (p < 0.01), with both posttest and follow-up scores significantly higher than baseline. Although scores declined slightly at follow-up compared with the posttest, improvements were largely maintained. Optimism showed the greatest immediate increase, while self-efficacy remained the highest at follow-up. Qualitative findings were broadly consistent with the quantitative results, suggesting enhanced confidence, hope, coping ability, and social engagement among participants. Caregiver involvement also appeared to support the maintenance of positive changes over time.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that a strengths-based, community-driven positive psychology intervention may enhance psychological well-being among adults with physical disabilities. The novelty of the program lies in systematically engaging caregivers as co-facilitators, bridging rehabilitation and positive psychology within a low-resource, rural context. The findings suggest that caregiver-supported positive psychology interventions offer a replicable framework for community-based disability care and may inform efforts to promote resilience, optimism, and health equity.

Indexed as

CaregiversPersons with DisabilitiesPsychology, PositiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptimismPsychological Well-BeingPsychosocial InterventionResilience, PsychologicalRural PopulationSelf EfficacyThailandCaregiversPhysical disabilityPositive psychology interventionsPsychological capitalResilience

Identifiers

PMID41866509
PMCPMC13130704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.