ArticleBMC oral health2026
Predictors for complications and the removal of osteosynthesis material after mandibular fractures: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to identify factors leading to postoperative complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures. In addition, predictors associated with plate removal after surgery were identified.
methodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included adult patients who underwent primary ORIF of mandibular fractures between 12/2017 and 12/2019. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records. The primary outcome was postoperative surgical site– and hardware-related complications, defined as wound healing disorder, surgical site infection, fistula formation, or plate exposure. The secondary outcome was removal of osteosynthesis material. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for both outcomes.
resultsA total of 377 patients were included. Postoperative surgical site– or hardware-related complications occurred in 17.0% of patients. Osteosynthesis material was removed in 112 patients (29.6%) during follow-up. The most frequent indication for removal was patient request without medical complaints (48.6%), followed by sensory disturbance (20.7%) and infection (18.9%). In multivariable analysis, falls as trauma mechanism were associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). Younger age (< 65 years; p < 0.01) and the occurrence of any postoperative complication (p < 0.01) were independently associated with subsequent osteosynthesis removal.
conclusionsPlate removal is more likely in cases with complications and in patients < 65 years. Further research is needed to investigate whether and to what extent a second operation for osteosyntheses removal is really necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.