Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Quality of antenatal care provision in rural villages of Satna district, Madhya Pradesh, India: a quantitative formative study to help the development of an evidence-based contextualized complex health intervention of the CHAMPION2 cluster randomized trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2005, maternal and newborn deaths have declined in India. Nonetheless, if the current mortality trends continue, India may not achieve the Sustainable Development Goal targets without enhancing the quality of care across the continuum from pregnancy to delivery, particularly in poorly performing states. This study aimed to help the development of an evidence-based contextualized CHAMPION2 trial package of maternal and child health (being implemented in rural villages of Satna district, India) by assessing the quality of, and the factors associated with antenatal care (ANC) provision across four aspects of care and exploring reasons if uptake of care was inadequate.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study in 50 of 196 villages in the CHAMPION2 cluster randomized trial in Satna district, Madhya Pradesh, India before randomization. We interviewed 792 women, who were eligible for the trial and had given birth in the previous two years from the interview date. We assessed the quality of ANC provision across four aspects of care (i.e., skilled care, timeliness (ANC in first trimester), number of ANC visits (at least four), and content of care) and explored women’s reasons if the uptake of care was inadequate. The quality of ANC provision was considered ‘adequate’ if all the four aspects of care were judged sufficient. We conducted logistic regression analyses to determine the socio-demographic factors associated with the adequate quality of ANC provision.
resultsOnly 21.2% of women received ANC provision of ‘adequate’ quality (skilled care: 98.9%, timeliness: 75.3%, minimum four ANCs: 73.5%, and appropriate content of care: 28.3%). The inadequate quality was primarily due to inappropriate content of care, particularly poor compliance with iron-folate intake for at least 100 days and no counseling by healthcare providers on key ANC issues. The odds of receiving adequate quality ANC were increased when either the woman or husband was educated to at least high school level.
conclusionsThe quality of ANC provision in the study setting was inadequate. The quality of care was emphasized in refresher training for nurses in the CHAMPION2 trial and health promotion, demand generation, and community mobilization activities were locally contextualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.