Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866487›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Differential diagnosis of benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma presenting as lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid nodules based on multiscale CT radiomics.

Jiayue Xie, Siyu Che, Junjie Li, Yuxin Niu, Yifan He, Shuai Hu, Dongxue Qin, Zhiyong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiayue XieDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Siyu CheDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Junjie LiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Yuxin NiuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Yifan HeDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Shuai HuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
Dongxue QinDepartment of Radiology, the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Zhiyong LiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan road No.222, Xigang District, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China. zjy_lzy@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-1460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBased on multiscale computed tomography (CT) radiomics, a better model was established to differentially diagnose benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe retrospective study included 178 patients with solid pulmonary nodules were assigned to the training dataset (n = 124) and the testing dataset (n = 54). Gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) was used to reduce the dimensionality of data and select the best radiomics features. Four models were developed by logistic regression method, namely the clinical and imaging model (CIM), the plain CT radiomics model (PRM), the enhanced CT radiomics model (ERM), and the combined model (CM). Area under the curve (AUC) evaluates the model performance. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination index (IDI) were calculated to compare the performance of different models to determine the best model.

resultsIn the training dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM, and CM were 0.795, 0.791, 0.828, and 0.888. The continuous NRI and IDI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.001), CM is optimal. In the testing dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM and CM were 0.810, 0.689, 0.864 and 0.881. The continuous NRI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.050). The IDI of CM was better than that of CIM and PRM (P < 0.050). The AUC values of the Mayo Clinic (Mayo) model, Veterans Administration (VA) model, Peking University People’s Hospital (PKUPH) model and United Imaging Artificial Intelligence (UI AI) model were 0.419, 0.410, 0.676 and 0.675, CM is still optimal.

conclusionRadiomics can be used as a non-invasive tool to distinguish between benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules, and CM is the best predictive model.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedDecision TreesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveContrast enhancedDifferential diagnosisLung adenocarcinomaPulmonary noduleRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41866487
PMCPMC13137663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.