Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866471›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2026

Patient satisfaction following orthodontic treatment and its association with ABO Model Grading System: a cross-sectional study.

Yomna Abdallah Elfaisal, Amira Ahmed Aboalnaga, Mona M Salah Fayed

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04928768 (Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in an Egyptian Sample After Orthodontic Treatment of Different Malocclusions. An Observational Cross Sectional Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04928768 unknown statusnot on this map

Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in an Egyptian Sample After Orthodontic Treatment of Different Malocclusions. An Observational Cross Sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled197ConditionsPatient SatisfactionArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yomna Abdallah ElfaisalDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt. yomna.elfaisal@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Amira Ahmed AboalnagaOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mona M Salah FayedOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental appearance significantly impacts self-perception, yet clinician-based indices often fail to capture the subjective nature of patient satisfaction. Despite the importance of patient-reported outcomes, their relationship with objective measures like the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Model Grading System remains under investigated. This study aimed to assess post-orthodontic patient satisfaction and determine its association with objective treatment outcomes, as well as various demographic and clinical factors.

methodsThis observational cross-sectional analytical study aimed to assess post-orthodontic patient satisfaction and to examine its association with objective treatment outcomes measured using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System. A total of 197 patients (≥ 16 years) who completed orthodontic treatment at Cairo University were included. A cross-culturally adapted and validated questionnaire assessing ten satisfaction domains was administered using a 5-point Likert scale. The total satisfaction score was calculated as the mean of all items. Associations between satisfaction and demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors were analyzed. Malocclusion classification and final treatment outcomes were evaluated using ABO model grading to correlate subjective satisfaction with objective measures.

resultsClass I malocclusion was the most common (50.7%), followed by Class II (34.5%) and Class III (14.7%). Overall, 81.7% of participants reported being satisfied or very satisfied, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.24 out of 5. Younger patients (< 20 years) demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction levels (p < 0.01). No significant associations were observed between satisfaction and gender, type of malocclusion, or ABO outcome grading. Motivation, pre-treatment concerns, and treatment-related discomfort were not significantly correlated with overall satisfaction.

conclusionsBoth adolescents and adults report high levels of satisfaction following orthodontic treatment, with adolescents reporting the greatest satisfaction. Patient-perceived success is not solely determined by objective clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of addressing patient expectations and experiences during treatment.

trial registrationThis study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on [15-06-2021] with the registration number NCT04928768.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOrthodontics, CorrectivePatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultLikert scaleMalocclusionObjective measuresOrthodonticsPatient SatisfactionQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID41866471
PMCPMC13063472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.