ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Reconciling canopy light interception and photosynthetic efficiency to optimize source-sink coordination and yield formation in winter wheat.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimizing the seeding rate is critical for wheat productivity. However, excessive densification often compromises individual photosynthetic efficiency to maximize canopy light interception, creating a trade-off that constrains yield. The physiological mechanisms linking canopy structure, photosynthesis, and source-sink coordination under varying seeding rates remain insufficiently quantified.
resultsBased on a two-year field trial assessing four seeding rates, i.e., 22.5 × 10⁵ (D15), 30.0 × 10⁵ (D20), 37.5 × 10⁵ (D25), and 45.0 × 10⁵ (D30) plants ha⁻¹, this study evaluated how seeding rate regulates leaf photosynthetic performance, canopy architecture, dry matter accumulation and yield formation in winter wheat. Compared to D15, the D20 treatment maintained photosynthetic integrity. D25 and D30 triggered severe non-stomatal limitations, characterized by a 14.1%–28.1% decrease in net photosynthetic rate and a 10.4%–25.0% increase in intercellular CO2 concentration. This physiological decline negated the structural benefits of maximized light interception. Mechanistically, D20 optimized the source-sink relationship by promoting post-flowering dry matter accumulation, significantly increasing the number of spikes by 35.2%, thereby enhancing the yield by 30%. Crucially, it avoided the resource-dilution penalties typical of high seeding rates. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling confirmed that seeding rate regulates yield by reconciling the trade-off between population expansion and metabolic competence. Machine learning simulation further refined the optimal seeding rate to 30.7 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹, defining a high-yield stability window (26.4–35.1 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹) characterized by specific physiological indicators (LAI 4.6–5.3, upper IPAR 68%–73%, Pn 22.2–25.5 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹).
conclusionsOptimizing the seeding rate successfully reconciles the trade-off between canopy light capture and photosynthetic efficiency. By maintaining metabolic integrity while expanding population structure, the optimal seeding rate coordinates source-sink relationships to maximize yield. This study provides a mechanistic framework and quantitative physiological thresholds for precision management. Future applications should account for genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions to refine these parameters across diverse wheat production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.