ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026
Reflexive priority of biological motion in attentional orienting: evidence from conflict resistance in complex visual settings.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans involuntarily orient their attention to walking direction of biological motion (BM), a crucial skill for adaptive survival and social interaction. While previous studies have been limited to isolated BM displays, real-world scenarios typically include BM alongside multiple competing stimuli, hampering the translation of laboratory insights into practical applications. Here, we introduced simultaneously presented BM cues and other social (eye gaze) or nonsocial (arrow) cues into a modified central cueing paradigm, reassessing the reflexive nature of BM-induced attention from the perspective of conflict resistance. Results showed that the attentional orienting elicited by BM was robust enough to resist interference from peripheral arrows throughout the task yet interfered with central arrow processing. This unique asymmetric interference effect highlights the reflexive priority of BM over nonsocial cues. Additionally, mutual interference between BM and eye gaze suggests that different types of social cues trigger attentional shifts with a considerable degree of reflexivity. Based on an interference-resilient criterion, these findings together imply that social attention is supported by a specialized mechanism shared across various social but not nonsocial cues. This mechanism potentially enables us to instinctively prioritize and orient toward social signals amid competing nonsocial cues in complex real-world settings, with direct implications for designing signaling systems in safety-critical contexts and developing early diagnostic tools for sociocognitive disorders such as autism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.