ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Forgotten joint score one year after robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the postoperative results of patients who underwent cTKA compared to those who underwent robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA). A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent primary TKA. Patients were classified into two groups based on prosthesis type. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Statistical analysis included multiple linear regression to identify predictors of joint awareness. A total of 181 patients were analyzed (raTKA group: n = 90; cTKA group: n = 91). FJS scores were significantly higher in the raTKA group (72.5 [54.1–100]) than in the cTKA group (61.8 [39.6–91.7]; p = 0.004). Regression analysis identified the male sex (coef. = 11.50, p = 0.005) as a positive predictor of FJS, while cTKA group was associated with lower scores (coef. = − 9.09, p = 0.026). Body mass index showed no significant association with FJS (coef. = 0.65, p = 0.214). Surgery type and sex influence joint awareness after TKA. Male patients and those undergoing robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated superior functional perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.