ArticleScientific reports2026
A misclassification-aware explainable hybrid CNN-vision transformer framework for radiographic weld inspection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper and valid identification of the defects in welding is also essential in the safety-critical manufacturing systems in order to maintain structural integrity. In general, even though deep learning-based inspection methods have demonstrated high classification accuracy, they frequently fail to distinguish similar-looking types of defects and misclassify them at high costs in practice. The paper presented an intelligent weld inspection framework, hybrid Convolutional Neural Network-Vision Transformer (CNN -ViT) architecture, aimed at improving reliability and interpretability, with potential relevance to Industry 5.0-oriented inspection systems. The suggested model was relatively tested against a tailored lightweight CNN baseline, provided that the same training conditions were implemented with the RIAWELC radiographic weld dataset. It is demonstrated that the hybrid CNN-ViT has the highest accuracy of 98.56%, compared to the CNN baseline (97.90%), at a relative difference of about 31% in the misclassification rate. Misclassification-sensitive analysis with confusion matrices aided by explainability methods with Grad-CAM and transformer self-attention maps proves that the global contextual modeling significantly enhances the discrimination of visually similar defects that include cracks, porosity, and absence of penetration. The trained model was also tested on external data (GDXray dataset) collected under different imaging conditions to test its robustness and it was found to perform well on generalization. Moreover, fivefold cross-validation was performed in order to evaluate how the model performs across different data partitions. These findings validate that the suggested hybrid attention-based framework, in addition to the accuracy improvement, leads to the decrease in the misclassification and the availability of the transparent decision explanations. In general, the suggested solution would be a technically robust and explainable framework that may support future Industry 5.0-aligned intelligent weld inspection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.