ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning approach to super-resolution correction of brain MRI motion artifacts for accurate hippocampal volumetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate whether enhanced deep super-resolution network (EDSR) can reduce motion artifacts in brain MRI and improve hippocampal volumetry. We enrolled 24 healthy adults. Each participant underwent one acquisition without intentional movement (OI) and two acquisitions with instructed head movements to generate motion-corrupted images (MI). EDSR was applied to MI to generate motion-corrected images (EI). Hippocampal volumes were automatically measured using the brain anatomical analysis using diffeomorphic deformation software, and absolute percentage errors were calculated relative to the VOI. Participants were classified into low-motion (MI absolute percentage error (APE) < 10% for both hippocampi) and high-motion (MI APE ≥ 10% for either hippocampus) groups. Bland–Altman analysis was performed using absolute differences. Image quality was evaluated using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and mean absolute error (MAE) computed against registered OI in the MI space. Median APE did not differ significantly between MI and EI overall. In the high-motion sneeze subgroup, left-hippocampal APE decreased after EDSR, whereas other subgroup comparisons were not significant. EI showed higher PSNR and SSIM and lower MAE than MI (all P < 0.001). EDSR improves image quality metrics and can reduce hippocampal volumetry error in selected high-motion cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.