ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated kidney stone segmentation from flexible ureteroscopy videos using a U-net model: A preliminary feasibility study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual identification of kidney stones during flexible ureteroscopy can be challenging due to motion, variable illumination, bleeding, dust from fragmentation, and limited visual contrast. While machine learning has been applied to nephrolithiasis using radiological imaging, relatively few studies have explored direct segmentation of kidney stones from ureteroscopic video, which is most relevant for intraoperative guidance. We conducted a preliminary feasibility study using 12 recorded flexible ureteroscopy procedure videos from 12 distinct patients (approximately 11 h of footage). Frames were extracted and annotated using a semi-automated pipeline combining manual bounding boxes with automated mask generation. A 2D U-Net model with a DenseNet-121 encoder was trained to segment kidney stones from video frames. Data were split at the video and patient level into training (8 videos), validation (2 videos), and test (2 videos) sets. Model performance was evaluated using pixel accuracy and Dice coefficient, and inference speed was measured on an NVIDIA T4 GPU. On the validation set, the model achieved a pixel accuracy of 94% and a Dice coefficient of 73%. On the held-out test set, it achieved a pixel accuracy of 92% with a Dice coefficient of 76%. Segmentation performance was highest when stones were clearly visible and degraded under challenging visual conditions such as bleeding, dense dust, and severe motion blur. The average inference time was 32.85 ms per frame, corresponding to approximately 30 frames per second. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning–based kidney stone segmentation from real-world flexible ureteroscopy video frames. While results are preliminary and limited by dataset size, single-center data, and lack of clinical integration, the findings highlight both the potential and the challenges of intraoperative video-based stone segmentation. Future work will focus on dataset expansion, multi-center validation, and integration into real-time surgical workflows for controlled evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.