ArticleScientific reports2026
A sample model for applying feature selection and machine learning techniques to estimate and manage crayfish populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable fishing and aquaculture production require not only data collection but also its proper application. Another factor influencing the study’s direction is dataset size. Regardless of dataset size, the most critical aspect of data use is feature selection. This study focuses on estimating sustainable fishing and aquaculture production by selecting relevant features and appropriate algorithms for both sexes and all individuals in the crayfish population living in the Atikisar Reservoir. For this purpose, the Mean method was used for data preprocessing, Pearson correlation analysis for feature selection, and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Machine Regression (SVMR), Gradient Enhancement Regression (GBR), Sampled Sum (Bootstrap Combination, Bagging) Regression (BAR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and k-Nearest Neighbors Regression (k-NNR) algorithms were used for prediction and stock management. Additionally, the data obtained from the population were evaluated within the framework of the classical length-weight relationship. The MLR, GBR, and RFR algorithms showed the highest coefficients of determination (R² = 0.98) for female individuals; the MLR, GBR, BAR, RFR, and k-NNR algorithms had the highest R² values (0.96) for male individuals; and the MLR, GBR, RFR, and k-NNR algorithms achieved the best coefficients of determination (R² = 0.98) for the entire population. Analyzing crayfish populations using the GBR algorithm will enable us to make predictions with the highest accuracy level and to manage populations, after processing the data with the Mean method from data preprocessing methods, and performing feature selection with Pearson correlation analysis. Regression analyses and machine learning algorithms, applied to overall and sexual length and weight of crayfish caught in the Atikhisar Reservoir, revealed positive allometric growth in the TL-TW and meat yield relationship for females, males, and the entire population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.