ArticleScientific reports2026
Segmented optimization for river ecological corridor width based on ecosystem services: a case study of the North Canal River, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adapting to climate change requires a better understanding of how the spatial configuration of river ecological corridors influences both ecological connectivity and ecosystem service delivery. Corridor width is a critical factor in corridor planning, yet uniform design approaches often overlook the strong spatial heterogeneity between urban and rural river segments. In this study, we investigated the North Canal River in Beijing, quantifying the effects of corridor width on ecosystem service value through integration land use data (1990–2020), landscape pattern metrics, and segmented regression analysis. The results revealed pronounced contrasts in land–use trajectories between urban and rural corridors. Urban cropland declined by more than 70%, while built–up land expanded substantially before partially retreating following large–scale ecological restoration after 2015. Rural corridors experienced more moderate cropland loss and consistently maintained higher landscape aggregation and lower fragmentation. Increasing corridor width enhanced spatial connectivity and landscape stability, particularly in rural segments. Ecosystem service value exhibited a clear non–linear response to corridor width. Urban river corridors were increasingly dominated by cultural services, whereas rural corridors retained robust regulation and supporting services. Breakpoint models identified service–based width thresholds at approximately 126 m for urban and 311 m for rural corridors, respectively. These findings underscore the importance of context–specific corridor design that accounts for spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem service responses and provide quantitative support for adaptive river corridor planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.