ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Centering community-engaged research in NCI cancer centers: optimizing Community Outreach and Engagement (COE).
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging Lived and Expert Experience: A Qualitative Study Exploring Lived-Experience Experts' and Researchers' Experiences of Public Engagement in Cancer Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although cancer prevention, care, and survivorship in the United States have dramatically improved over the last decade, inequities in morbidity and mortality among under-resourced populations have grown, mostly attributed to structural, societal, and institutional factors. To address inequities in cancer-related outcomes, community-engaged research (CEnR) and practice remains essential. Community-engaged research is generally supported by Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) units in National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. For more than a decade, COE remains a requirement for comprehensive designation and is a significant factor in the overall cancer center scoring. Community engagement occurs on a continuum from community-engaged to community-based participatory research. Engaging communities experiencing inequities in cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality to ameliorate factors contributing to poorer cancer-related outcomes remains a goal, albeit a challenging one. This commentary details both novel and successful approaches that researchers throughout the country have used to engage communities to address cancer-related inequities in their catchment areas by leveraging COE infrastructure to facilitate CEnR across research programs. We also highlight and forward recommendations from a recent scientific pre-conference workshop. Cancer center-led CEnR is critical to engaging with key communities, and yet there are tremendous opportunities to better articulate and implement approaches to effective engagement. Internal inequities and barriers in COE infrastructures and how researchers, directors, and stakeholders can collaborate to optimize cancer health outcome/CEnR are discussed, in addition to potential solutions involving collaboration with upstream policy stakeholders. In this commentary, we emphasize why this work remains an ongoing but critical priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.