ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2026
Consensus palliative care referral criteria for people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an international Delphi study.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often experience rapid disease progression and high burden of distressing symptoms. Timely referral to specialist palliative care for people with IPF is uncommon.
objectivesThis study aims to establish consensus on criteria that would prompt a referral to specialist palliative care for people living with IPF.
methodsAn international Delphi study was conducted over 3 online rounds between April and July 2025 to identify consensus among expert clinicians and researchers on the referral criteria for specialist palliative care for people living with IPF. Consensus was defined a priori as agreement of at least 70%. A focus group of people with lived experience of IPF or specialist palliative care was conducted to provide feedback on the relevance and acceptability of the putative referral criteria.
resultsUp to 46 expert panelists participated in the Delphi study. Panelists included physicians (78%-83%) and nurses (15%-20%) with specialist qualifications in respiratory (80%-84%) or palliative medicine (31%-35%). Consensus was reached on 17 major criteria and 40 minor criteria relating to "hospital utilization," "respiratory therapies," "symptom distress," "comorbidities," "exacerbation of IPF," "time-based factors," and "psychosocial factors." Focus group participants (n = 6) broadly concurred with the agreement rates from the panelists, albeit often leaning toward earlier indicators than those which reached final consensus as major criteria.
conclusionsConsensus referral criteria for specialist palliative care referral in IPF are presented, which emphasize comprehensive needs assessment and open communication between clinicians and patients. Future work is needed to examine the implementation of these criteria in clinical respiratory care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.