ReviewVox sanguinis2026
Harnessing big data and artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine: Opportunities for precision, safety and efficiency.
Review in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Harnessing big data and artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine: Opportunities for precision, safety and efficiency.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transfusion medicine generates enormous volumes of data across the vein-to-vein continuum, spanning donor characteristics, laboratory testing, component manufacturing, logistics and recipient outcomes. The emergence of big data infrastructures, coupled with artificial intelligence (AI), offers a transformative opportunity to harness this information for safer, more efficient and better personalized transfusion practices. This narrative review outlines current and potential applications of AI and machine learning (ML) at each phase of the big data pipeline in transfusion medicine, including data collection, wrangling and harmonization, validation, feature engineering, analysis, publication and knowledge mobilization. We discuss how AI-enabled methods-such as natural language processing to extract variables, anomaly detection for product quality, supervised models to predict risks, federated analysis for collaboration, and forecasting algorithms to optimize inventory and logistics-may address longstanding challenges related to data fragmentation, unstructured documentation and labour-intensive manual validation. We emphasize critical risks and limitations of applying AI to big data analytics and discuss mitigation through robust governance, performance monitoring, fairness audits, cybersecurity measures and transparent human oversight. We end by offering key recommendations and future directions, highlighting that strategic, equitable and ethically sound implementation will be essential to realizing benefits and ensuring trust in an increasingly data-driven transfusion ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.