ReviewJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026
Contemporary management of superior vena cava syndrome.
Review in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuperior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a rare but severe medical condition owing to obstruction of the venous return to the heart through the innominate veins and the SVC. Lung cancer is the most common malignant cause, while central vein thrombosis owing to intravenous lines and pacemaker wires as well as mediastinal fibrosis are the frequent benign etiologies.
methodsThis review is based on an analysis of published literature reporting the results of endovenous management of SVC syndrome.
resultsEndovenous treatment, with balloon angioplasty and immediate stenting, has become the first line of treatment of all causes of symptomatic SVC syndrome. Various stents have been used, including balloon and self-expanding stents, woven, braided, and laser-cut nitinol stents, as well as open- and closed-cell designs. However, no single type has demonstrated superiority in comparative clinical studies. Evidence increasingly suggests that covered stents are safer for SVC obstruction, offering patency rates comparable with noncovered stents while decreasing the risk of lethal complications such as rupture and pericardial tamponade. For patients with malignant disease, fabric-covered stents may also decrease tumor ingrowth. Open surgery remains a viable option using spiral saphenous vein graft, femoral vein, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for those who are not candidates for endovascular interventions or fail after repeat interventions.
conclusionsStent placement is a safe and effective first-line treatment for symptomatic SVC syndrome of both malignant or benign etiologies, with likely better outcomes and fewer complications associated with using covered stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.