ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
Noninvasive SARS-CoV-2 detection using a low-cost electronic nose.
Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the urgent need for rapid and accurate SARS-CoV-2 detection. Current diagnostic methods often suffer from discomfort, slow results, and limited accuracy in early infection stages. This study proposes a solution: a noninvasive, rapid, and accurate detection approach for point-of-care settings using a metal-oxide-sensor-based electronic nose. This innovative electronic nose uses an array of off-the-shelf gas sensors. These sensors detect and analyze the volatile organic compounds present in saliva and exhaled breath, which change based on the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We evaluated the discriminatory power of the electronic nose using a suite of machine learning algorithms, specifically K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Random Forest, to differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 infected and non-infected samples. Accuracy metrics ranged from 76% to 89% for exhaled breath samples and from 75% to 86% for saliva samples. Optimal accuracy was achieved with the KNN algorithm, yielding an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI 0.825‒0.897) for saliva and 0.895 (95% CI 0.850‒0.940) for exhaled breath. These results support the feasibility and proof-of-concept performance of a low-cost electronic nose for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a real-world hospital cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.