Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865674›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Noninvasive SARS-CoV-2 detection using a low-cost electronic nose.

Gabriel Fialkovitz, Pedro Lobo Sousa, Amanda Miyuki Hidifira, Gustavo Henrique Pereira Boog, Bruno Montico Costa, Wellington Belarmino Gonçalves, Mariana Martins De Oliveira Netto, Alessandra Luna-Muschi, Pablo Munoz Torres, Lucas Augusto Moyses Franco and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gabriel FialkovitzUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Unidade de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar, Instituto do Coração (InCor), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: gabriel.fialkovitz@hc.fm.usp.br.
Pedro Lobo SousaUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Química, Departamento de Química Fundamental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Amanda Miyuki HidifiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Pereira BoogUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Montico CostaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Wellington Belarmino GonçalvesUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Química, Departamento de Química Fundamental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mariana Martins De Oliveira NettoUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Química, Departamento de Química Fundamental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alessandra Luna-MuschiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pablo Munoz TorresUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lucas Augusto Moyses FrancoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ester Cerdeiro SabinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Silvia Figueiredo CostaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jonas GruberUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Química, Departamento de Química Fundamental, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: jogruber@iq.usp.br.
Anna Sara LevinUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the urgent need for rapid and accurate SARS-CoV-2 detection. Current diagnostic methods often suffer from discomfort, slow results, and limited accuracy in early infection stages. This study proposes a solution: a noninvasive, rapid, and accurate detection approach for point-of-care settings using a metal-oxide-sensor-based electronic nose. This innovative electronic nose uses an array of off-the-shelf gas sensors. These sensors detect and analyze the volatile organic compounds present in saliva and exhaled breath, which change based on the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We evaluated the discriminatory power of the electronic nose using a suite of machine learning algorithms, specifically K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks (NN), and Random Forest, to differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 infected and non-infected samples. Accuracy metrics ranged from 76% to 89% for exhaled breath samples and from 75% to 86% for saliva samples. Optimal accuracy was achieved with the KNN algorithm, yielding an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.861 (95% CI 0.825‒0.897) for saliva and 0.895 (95% CI 0.850‒0.940) for exhaled breath. These results support the feasibility and proof-of-concept performance of a low-cost electronic nose for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a real-world hospital cohort.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesElectronic NoseSalivaAlgorithmsBreath TestsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsPoint-of-Care SystemsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsCOVID-19Electronic noseNoninvasive detectionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41865674
PMCPMC13069424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.