ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Management Strategy for Anaphylaxis in a Patient With Suspected or Confirmed Mastocytosis: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anaphylaxis is a severe, systemic hypersensitivity reaction that poses a potential threat to life. The occurrence of mastocytosis increases the likelihood of severe anaphylactic reactions. Appropriate management is crucial for improving clinical outcomes. CASE REPORT The case describes severe anaphylactic shock in a 31-year-old female patient with suspected mastocytosis. The shock occurred following a sting by a hymenopteran insect. The patient required mechanical ventilation and circulatory support for cardio-respiratory failure. Because of insufficient response to intramuscular injections of epinephrine, continuous intravascular infusion was needed. Intensive fluid therapy with balanced crystalloids was administered. As part of supportive treatment, antihistamines (rupatadine via a nasogastric tube) and intravenous glucocorticosteroids were given. Acid-base disturbances were also corrected. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit on the third day of hospitalization in good general condition. CONCLUSIONS The core management of anaphylaxis in a patient with suspected or diagnosed mastocytosis is similar to the general recommendations for anaphylaxis treatment. However, it should be noted that patients with mastocytosis can have significantly higher requirements for adrenaline. Continuous intravenous infusion of adrenaline during the first 1 to 2 days following the onset of anaphylaxis may be warranted. Due to the rapid course of anaphylaxis and excessive immune response, more severe disturbances in organ perfusion can occur, resulting in metabolic acidosis. In such patients, intravenous infusion of sodium bicarbonate can be necessary. Therefore, patients with mastocytosis who experience anaphylaxis may be less responsive to epinephrine and should be admitted to the intensive care unit early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.