ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026
Enhancing Podiatry Students' Understanding of Foot Arch Through Footprint Activity.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the structural anatomy and biomechanics of the foot arches is essential for podiatry students due to its clinical relevance in diagnosing conditions such as Pes Planus and Pes Cavus. The foot arches form a flexible base that supports body weight, absorbs shock and functions as a spring lever during activities such as walking and jumping. Therefore, understanding this anatomical knowledge is fundamental for podiatry students for maintaining foot health and supporting clinical assessment and treatment planning. Traditional pedagogical methods often face limitations due to cost, accessibility and emotional or cultural barriers.
methodsTo address these challenges, the footprint practical activity (FPA) was introduced as a hands-on, cost-effective and inclusive pedagogical strategy. Students collected their footprints and analysed two-dimensional footprints to interpret three-dimensional foot arch structures using Staheli's and Chippaux-Smirak indices. Educational impact was assessed by comparing overall grades between pre- (2020) and post-implementation (2023) cohorts.
resultsImplementation of the FPA resulted in a 12% improvement in academic outcomes. Student feedback highlighted enhanced anatomical comprehension and appreciation of clinical relevance, supporting the effectiveness of the intervention. The diagnostic tools used in the activity, Staheli's index and the Chippaux-Smirak index, showed consistent classification outcomes.
conclusionThe finding supports the integration of footprint-based analysis into lower limb anatomy education as a clinically relevant student-centred approach. The FPA enhances student engagement, supports anatomical learning and facilitates the teaching of foot arch variation, offering a valuable alternative to traditional pedagogical methods in podiatry anatomy education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.