Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bipolar disorders2026

The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial.

Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Asbjørn Risom, Malene Schwarz Dyreholt, Natacha Blauenfeldt Kyster, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Birte Smidt, Ulla Knorr, Kim Brøndmark, Anja Mathiesen, Denis Cululejevic and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04230421 (Effects of Smartphone-based Treatment for Bipolar Disorder - the Smart Bipolar RCT), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04230421 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Smartphone-based Treatment for Bipolar Disorder - the Smart Bipolar RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsBipolar DisorderArmsThe Monsenso system with feedback, The Monsenso system without feedback, CAG Bipola and mood monitoring only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Maria Faurholt-JepsenCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark. maria@faurholt-jepsen.dk.
Asbjørn RisomSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene Schwarz DyreholtCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Natacha Blauenfeldt KysterCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Ellen Margrethe ChristensenCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Birte SmidtCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Ulla KnorrCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Kim BrøndmarkCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.
Anja MathiesenThe Early Multimodular Prevention and Intervention Research Institution (EMPIRI), Mental Health Centre, Northern Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Denis CululejevicThe Early Multimodular Prevention and Intervention Research Institution (EMPIRI), Mental Health Centre, Northern Zealand, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rene SjaellandPsychiatric Center Amager, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Nørbak-EmigPsychiatric Center Amager, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lotte Linnemann SponsorPsychiatric Center Amager, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Darius MardosasPsychiatric Center Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jens Drachmann BukhRegion Zealand Mental Health Services, Region Zealand, Denmark.
Trine Vøgg HellerPsychiatric Center Ballerup, Ballerup, Denmark.
Nanna IversenMonsenso A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maj VinbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Esben Budtz-JørgensenSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Vedel KessingCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Hovedvejen 17, 1. Floor, Frederiksberg, DK- 2000, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder experience daily variability in mood that seems associated with poor prognostic factors, including impaired functioning, and increased risk of hospitalisation and relapse. The present SmartBipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether group (1) daily smartphone-based outpatient monitoring and treatment including CBT elements with clinical feedback (intervention group) versus group (2) daily smartphone-based monitoring and treatment with CBT elements without clinical feedback (content was the same as intervention group but without clinical feedback) (control group) or group (3) daily smartphone-based mood monitoring only without CBT elements or other smartphone content (control group), improved mood instability and other clinically relevant patient-related outcomes in patients who have had a bipolar disorder for more than two years, and typically many years.

methodsThis study was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 6 months. The outcomes were (1) mood instability (primary), (2) questionnaire-based evaluations of quality of life, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, perceived stress, as well as smartphone-based measures of mood, activity, stress, anxiety, irritability, and sleep. Group differences were quantified using linear mixed models.

resultsA total of 201 patients with progressed bipolar disorder were included as part of their specialised outpatient treatment in the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial began in March 2021 with last patient follow-up in July 2025. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in the primary outcome mood instability (difference: 0, 95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98). In addition, there were no differences in other patient-reported outcome measures. LIMITATIONS: This was an unblinded trial.

conclusionThere was no positive or negative effects of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on primary or secondary outcomes in the present trial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04230421. Registered January, 2020.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderMood InstabilityRandomised controlled trialSmartphone-based monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41865316
PMCPMC13129000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.