ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
A four-step protocol to overcome loops/tortuosity during transradial coronary interventions: introducing the ''Serpentine'' technique.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The radial artery access is frequently used in coronary interventions. However, anatomical variations, such as loops, can pose significant challenges, leading to an increased number of access site crossovers. This study presents a four-step protocol introducing the “Serpentine” technique, a novel approach based on specific maneuvers using the Tiger-II catheter to navigate radial artery loops. This was based on a prospective registry of patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography at our tertiary hospital between 2020 and 2022 and our predefined four-step protocol was applied. Procedural success was defined as the completion of coronary angiography without the need for access site crossover. The incidence of access site crossover was evaluated. A total of 2,389 patients underwent coronary angiography at our center during the study period, and 130 patients (5.44%) were found to have radial artery extreme tortuosity/loop, with a mean age of 74 years. Of these, 75 patients (58%) were men. Using our protocol, radial artery access was successfully achieved in 124 patients (95.4%) with a median total procedure time to successful initiation of coronary angiography of 60 s (IQR 30–120). Only 6 patients (4.6%) required crossover to an alternative access site, and no severe anatomical complications were observed. Success by protocol step was as follows: Step 1 in 48 (37%), Step 2 in 61 (47%), Step 3 in 10 (7.7%), and Step 4 in 5 cases (3.8%). The proposed four-step strategy represents a promising, safe, and effective algorithm for overcoming loops during transradial coronary angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.