ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Oversight Organizations in Complex General Surgical Oncology - Potential Impact on Competency Based Education.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostgraduate training to become a surgical oncologist involves a general surgery residency and a Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) Fellowship, with most graduates spending approximately 9 years in training. This paradigm remains dependent on devoting a specific, fixed amount of time to training. A competency-based medical education (CBME) approach acknowledges that learners progress through different milestones at variable paces. Currently, several oversight organizations are involved in training surgical oncologists, which are still dependent on time-based training.
methodsA narrative review was conducted reviewing literature and current guidelines on CGSO training. The interplay between the various organizations was outlined in hypothetical models.
resultsMany organizations are involved in the ultimate oversight of surgical oncology training, including at the residency, fellowship, match, and board certification level. These organizations still rely on time spent in training for the ultimate approval of a trainee through each step of training. New initiatives are slowly introducing CBME, notably the Entrustable Professional Activity initiative through the American Board of Surgery.
conclusionsOur current training environment faces many challenges, including duty hours, increasing use of technology, and employment models that are quite different from those present at the outset of CGSO as a specialty. To improve our approach to training surgical oncologists, it is necessary to understand the current framework for oversight. We have reviewed the most relevant oversight bodies to allow for a better understanding of the machinery involved in any attempt to modify CGSO Fellowship towards a CBME model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41865208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.