ArticleScientific reports2026
Low-resolution FAIMS for increased peptide coverage in low-load and single-cell proteomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pushing the limits of single-cell proteomics to investigate bacterial heterogeneity using bacSCP.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS) is an indispensable tool in single-cell and low-input proteomics. Here, we show that tuning FAIMS resolution via electrode temperature modulation improves sensitivity. We demonstrate that lowering FAIMS resolution broadens the compensation voltage window, thereby increasing ion transmission. This significantly improves ion counts, quantitative precision and peptide identifications by 25-34%. These results were mirrored when analyzing single cell samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.