Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
From Passive Sampling to Precision Intervention: A Standardized Radiomics-Driven Workflow for Molecularly Adequate Lung Biopsy.
Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Hepatobiliary Phase Signal Analysis of HCC Nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MRI: A Potential Imaging Biomarker Associated with Disease Control After Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and temporally validate a predictive framework for molecular adequacy in computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) of lung lesions, integrating procedural variables with radiomic features derived from pre-procedural CT imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis observational derivation-validation study included 670 CT-guided TTNB procedures performed in 633 patients. A retrospective twin-center cohort (522 procedures) was used for model development and internal validation, while a prospective single-center cohort (148 procedures) served as an independent temporal validation set. Molecular adequacy for next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 testing was the primary endpoint. A multivariable model based on procedural predictors was developed and evaluated, followed by an exploratory radiomics sub-study integrating quantitative imaging features. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), calibration metrics, and transportability analyses. Procedural complications were classified according to the modified CIRSE classification system.
resultsOverall molecular adequacy for next-generation sequencing was 83.9%. The prospective validation cohort, managed under a standardized procedural framework, demonstrated a significantly higher adequacy rate compared with the retrospective cohort (91.2% vs. 82.6%). The procedural model achieved an AUC of 0.86 in the derivation cohort and 0.84 in the validation cohort. Integration of radiomics further improved discrimination (AUC 0.88), particularly in subsolid lesions. Complication rates were comparable between cohorts, with no increase in major complications.
conclusionMolecular adequacy in CT-guided lung biopsy can be meaningfully improved through procedural standardization and further enhanced by integrating radiomics. The proposed framework provides a foundation for future prospective evaluation of decision-support strategies in interventional radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41865181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.