ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Design and Validation of a Hand Interossei Muscle Dynamometer (HIMDNA) for Finger Abduction and Adduction Strength Measurement.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInterossei muscles of the hand, innervated primarily by the ulnar nerve, are essential for coordinated finger abduction and adduction. Quantitative strength assessment of these key actions, which support precision grip and fine motor control, may aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of neuropathic conditions including cubital tunnel syndrome. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel Hand Interossei Muscle Dynamometer (HIMDNA) for quantifying finger abduction and adduction strength for the index to little fingers and to establish normative values for healthy adults.
methodsHIMDNA was designed based on hand morphology, incorporating a load cell within a fixed frame and a linear guide mechanism to ensure uniaxial, examiner-independent force measurements. The abduction and adduction strengths of 48 healthy adults aged 20-39 years were measured and validated against index and little finger abduction measurements obtained with a handheld dynamometer (HHD). The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities and overall usability of HIMDNA were then compared with those of HHD.
resultsHIMDNA demonstrated excellent agreement with HHD (Pearson's r = 0.927 ~ 0.967; ICC = 0.911 ~ 0.956) and superior inter- and intra-rater reliabilities (ICC = 0.963 ~ 0.983). Normative values were approximately 4.5 ~ 23.4 N, with greater strength in the radial than ulnar direction except for the little finger. Participants rated HIMDNA higher in usefulness, effectiveness, and overall satisfaction than HHD.
conclusionHIMDNA provided a reliable, valid, and user-friendly way of quantifying finger abduction and adduction strengths, suggesting its potential as a standardized and clinically applicable tool for evaluating the strength of interossei muscles quantitatively in patients with ulnar nerve disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41865153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.