Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Assessment of thermally induced strength loss in alkali-activated concrete through ensemble regression models.

Yellanki Deepti, Sanjay Kumar, Atrayee Bandyopadhyay, Pramod Kumar, Regasa Yadeta Sembeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yellanki DeeptiDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, 831014, India.
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, 831014, India.
Atrayee BandyopadhyayDepartment of Civil Engineering, Haldia Institute of Technology, West Bengal, India.
Pramod KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1411-9374
Regasa Yadeta SembetaDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Mattu University, Metu, Ethiopia. yadetaregasa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-3155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alkali-activated concrete (AAC) is a sustainable alternative to Portland cement, offering superior thermal resistance. However, predicting the residual compressive strength of AAC after high-temperature exposure remains a complex challenge. This study addresses this gap by using machine learning (ML) to model AAC performance. A comprehensive database of 371 samples was compiled from the experimental analysis, detailing mix proportions and residual compressive strength after exposure to temperatures from 30 °C to 1000 °C. Five supervised machine learning models (Decision Tree, Bagging Regressor, AdaBoost, Random Forest, and XGBoost) were developed and evaluated. The XG Boost (XGB) model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.95 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.50. A feature correlation analysis identified curing temperature, curing duration, and alkali activator concentration as the most influential parameters. This study provides a validated ML model for accurately predicting the residual strength of AAC, offering a reliable tool for designing fire-resistant, sustainable concrete mixtures.

Indexed as

Alkali-activated concreteCompressive strengthElevated temperatureMachine learningRegression modelsSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41865129
PMCPMC13149981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.