Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An effective detection model based on YOLO for pore defects in additive manufacturing.

Rui Ni, Siwen Xu, Hanning Chen, Maowei He, Zhaodi Ge, Xiaodan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rui NiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Siwen XuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Hanning ChenSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Maowei HeSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Zhaodi GeSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Xiaodan LiangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China. 20050086@tiangong.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic imaging serves as a crucial method for assessing the quality of selective laser melting (SLM). Traditional approaches rely on manual inspection, which limits their efficiency and reproducibility. To address the demand for defect detection and analysis, this paper proposes a synergistic method for analyzing pore defects in microscopic images, integrating image segmentation with polynomial fitting. We designed a high-performance image segmentation model. Its capabilities are enhanced through an adaptive curved learning rate adjustment strategy, an attention-based feature extraction module, and a lightweight feature fusion network. Additionally, the model automatically calculates and quantifies the pixel proportion of pore defects within micrographs. Experiments conducted on a constructed SLM pore defect microscopic image dataset demonstrated excellent performance, enabling effective calibration and quantification of defect information. Chebyshev polynomials are employed to fit the nonlinear relationship between key process parameters and porosity. Based on these results, we conducted an in-depth analysis of how different process parameters influence pore defect formation, revealing the intrinsic correlation between process parameters and defects. This study provides an effective automated detection and analysis tool for SLM quality assessment and analysis.

Indexed as

Chebyshev polynomialImage segmentationPore defectSelective laser meltingYOLO

Identifiers

PMID41865116
PMCPMC13144673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.