ArticleScientific reports2026
An effective detection model based on YOLO for pore defects in additive manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic imaging serves as a crucial method for assessing the quality of selective laser melting (SLM). Traditional approaches rely on manual inspection, which limits their efficiency and reproducibility. To address the demand for defect detection and analysis, this paper proposes a synergistic method for analyzing pore defects in microscopic images, integrating image segmentation with polynomial fitting. We designed a high-performance image segmentation model. Its capabilities are enhanced through an adaptive curved learning rate adjustment strategy, an attention-based feature extraction module, and a lightweight feature fusion network. Additionally, the model automatically calculates and quantifies the pixel proportion of pore defects within micrographs. Experiments conducted on a constructed SLM pore defect microscopic image dataset demonstrated excellent performance, enabling effective calibration and quantification of defect information. Chebyshev polynomials are employed to fit the nonlinear relationship between key process parameters and porosity. Based on these results, we conducted an in-depth analysis of how different process parameters influence pore defect formation, revealing the intrinsic correlation between process parameters and defects. This study provides an effective automated detection and analysis tool for SLM quality assessment and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.