ArticleScientific reports2026
A multivariate decomposition analysis of urban-rural disparities in contraceptive use among women in Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contraceptive use is a key public health indicator linked to maternal and child health, women’s empowerment, and sustainable development. In Ethiopia, despite efforts to improve family planning, a substantial urban-rural disparity persists. Consequently, identifying the factors of the urban–rural gap is vital for fostering healthier women and developing evidence-driven approaches to address these disparities for contraceptive use. Therefore, this study aimed to assess urban-rural disparities and identify contributing factors in contraceptive use from the 2019 EMDHS. This study was conducted using the 2019 EMDHS among 8,885 reproductive-age women. A decomposition analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with the urban–rural disparity of contraceptive use, and the results were presented using text and tables. and figures. Statistical significance was declared at p-values < 0.05, with effect sizes reported with 95% confidence intervals. The magnitude of contraceptive use among reproductive-age women was 23.80%. Urban women had significantly higher contraceptive use compared to rural women. Endowment factors were responsible for 95.3% of the discrepancy. Educational status for secondary (β = 0.013; 95%CL: 0.005, 0.02; p = 0.001), higher education (β = 0.023; 95%CL: 0.005, 0.041; p = 0.010), wealth status with middle (β = 0.021; 95%CL: 0.013, 0.090; p < 0.001), rich (β = 0.083; 95%CL: 0.036, 0.130; p < 0.001), more than two births in the last five years (β = 0.006; 95%CL: 0.002, 0.010; p = 0.001) and know contraceptive method (β = 0.022; 95%CL: 0.010, 0.034; p < 0.001) were contributed to the disparity. But primary education (β = − 0.002; 95%CI: −0.003, − 0.001; p = 0.001) and number of living children greater than or equal to six (β = − 0.015; 95%CI: -0. 024, − 0.006; p = 0.001) contributed to the widening of the gap between urban and rural in contraceptive use. There is a significant variation between urban and rural women in contraceptive use. The larger portion of the discrepancy was explained by the endowments. Age, educational status, wealth status, births in the last five years, number of living children, and known contraceptive method were the significant factors contributing to the disparity. Efforts to improve educational attainment, economic empowerment, and contraceptive awareness in rural areas are critical to closing this disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.