Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41865112›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Choice-induced preference change under a sequential sampling model framework.

Douglas G Lee, Giovanni Pezzulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas G LeeInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Via Giandomenico Romagnosi 18a, 00196, Rome, Italy. DouglasGLee@gmail.com.
Giovanni PezzuloInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Via Giandomenico Romagnosi 18a, 00196, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequential sampling models of choice, such as the drift-diffusion model (DDM), are frequently fit to empirical data to account for a variety of effects related to accuracy/consistency, response time (RT), and sometimes confidence. However, no model in this class has been shown to account for the phenomenon known as choice-induced preference change, wherein decision makers tend to rate options higher after they choose them and lower after they reject them (and often choose the option that they had initially rated lower). Studies have reported choice-induced preference change for many decades, and the principal findings are robust. The resulting spreading of alternatives (SoA) in terms of their subjective value ratings is not considered by the traditional sequential sampling approach, which assumes the rated values of the options to be stationary throughout choice deliberation. Here, we propose that relaxing that assumption can allow this class of model to account for SoA. We show that the DDM can generate SoA (while simultaneously accounting for consistency and RT), as well as the relationships between SoA and choice difficulty, attribute disparity, and RT previously reported in the literature. Even the basic DDM can reproduce some empirical results, including multi-attribute evidence is necessary for others, and allowing different start times for each attribute enables a better match with the experimental data.

Indexed as

Drift–diffusion modelEvidence accumulationMulti-attribute choicePreferential choiceSpreading of alternatives

Identifiers

PMID41865112
PMCPMC13149806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.