ReviewMikrochimica acta2026
The evolution of next-generation lateral flow assays for bacterial and fungal diagnostics.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Resistance and the Return to a Pre-Antibiotic Era: A Critical Narrative Review of a Global Catastrophe.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious diseases driven by increasingly resistant bacterial and fungal pathogens demand diagnostics that are faster and more accessible than conventional culture-based methods. This review traces the evolution of lateral flow assays (LFAs) from simple qualitative strips to sophisticated, molecularly enhanced diagnostic platforms. This review synthesizes literature mostly published between 2010 and 2025, identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using search terms including 'lateral flow assay,' 'point-of-care diagnostics,' 'CRISPR diagnostics,' 'nanozyme biosensor,' 'antimicrobial resistance,' 'Candida auris,' and 'invasive aspergillosis. It highlights how advances in materials science (including quantum dots and nanozymes), isothermal amplification (RPA, LAMP), and CRISPR/Cas-based recognition have pushed LFAs toward laboratory-comparable sensitivity while preserving their simplicity. The clinical impact of these next-generation LFAs is illustrated using high-threat pathogens such as MRSA, Candida auris, and invasive Aspergillus, where rapid, point-of-care identification improves outcomes and supports antimicrobial stewardship. The review also examines the digital transformation of LFAs through smartphone-based readouts and artificial intelligence, which enable quantitative analysis and real-time epidemiological surveillance, even in remote settings. Despite ongoing challenges, including the hook effect, cross-reactivity, and regulatory fragmentation, the emerging technologies described here suggest that LFAs can help decouple high-quality infectious disease diagnostics from centralized laboratories, supporting a more equitable, global access to precision microbiological testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41865101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.