ArticleScientific reports2026
Hair and artifact removal in dermoscopic images using deep learning for enhanced skin cancer detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable ensemble transfer learning for skin lesion classification with multi-method explainability validation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely identification of melanoma and other cutaneous malignancies is fundamentally reliant on the acquisition of high-caliber dermoscopic images. However, factors such as hair interference, reflections, and various illumination artifacts frequently obscure essential characteristics of lesions, thereby impeding both clinical evaluations and automated diagnostic processes. This research introduces an innovative deep learning framework based on U-Net architecture, meticulously designed for the effective removal of hair and artifacts from dermoscopic images while ensuring the preservation of intricate lesion attributes, including pigmentary networks and irregular edges. The model underwent training predominantly on the HAM10000 dataset, which comprises 10,015 images sourced from multiple origins, and was rigorously validated on separate portions of both the HAM10000 dataset and the ISIC 2018 dataset. The training employed a hybrid loss function of Dice and Binary Cross-Entropy, alongside extensive data augmentation techniques and meticulous artifact mask creation. Quantitative assessments reveal significant improvements in image quality: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) increased from 21.5 dB to 34.1 dB, and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) enhanced from 0.79 to 0.89 for HAM10000 and from 0.77 to 0.92 for ISIC 2018, with Intersection over Union (IoU) ranging between 0.85 and 0.87 across the datasets. Subsequent melanoma classification utilizing a pre-trained model demonstrated notable improvements, with accuracy advancing from 84.2% to between 90.3% and 91.5%, F1-score rising from 81.6% to between 90.2% and 91.5%, along with an increase in prediction confidence. This methodology shows robust generalization capabilities across diverse artifact densities, types of lesions, and imaging environments, thereby establishing itself as a potent and adaptable preprocessing technique for standardized dermoscopic examinations and dependable AI-supported skin cancer diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.