ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance of a GPU- and time-efficient pseudo-3D network for magnetic resonance image super-resolution and motion artifact reduction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimizing acquisition time and motion-artifacts remains challenging in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with demands on high-resolution images for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Deep learning-based image restoration offers promising solution by generating high-resolution and artifact-free MR images from low-resolution or motion-corrupted data. To facilitate practical deployment in clinical workflows, this study presents a time-/GPU-efficient framework using 2D network (TS-RCAN) for pseudo-3D MRI super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) and motion-artifact reduction (MAR). Optimal down-sampling factors were identified to balance SRR accuracy and acquisition time. MAR training used a standardized method to induce controllable motion-artifacts of varying severity. Network performance was benchmarked against state-of-the-art 3D networks. Results showed the down-sampling factor [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] acceleration and [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] acceleration achieved optimal SRR performance. TS-RCAN outperformed most 3D networks by > 0.01/1.5 dB in SSIM/PSNR while reducing GPU load and inference time by up to 90%. For MAR, TS-RCAN exceeded UNet by up to 0.014/1.48 dB in SSIM/PSNR. Additionally, uncertainty estimation correlated with image quality metrics, enabling accuracy prediction without ground truth. TS-RCAN provides an efficient, accurate framework for SRR and MAR with practical relevance to clinical MRI, and offers a flexible basis for future extension to other imaging contrasts and pathological cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.