ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of artificial intelligence-based control algorithms to be implemented in an affordable transradial myoelectric prosthesis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assesses artificial intelligence-based control algorithms for a transradial myoelectric prosthesis. The analysis is supported by a dataset collected from 20 Peruvian participants with transradial amputation, including congenital and traumatic cases. Each participant performed 240 gesture repetitions under varying postures with surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals recorded on the user's forearm. The dataset was processed to extract time and frequency domain features, enabling the implementation of classifiers such as Neural Networks (NN), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Decision Trees (DT). The results demonstrate that RF and XGB outperformed other classifiers when employed in a stack model architecture (97.4% accuracy). Distal amputations exhibited superior outcomes, as results from users of congenital amputations were also superior. Favorable results were also observed among individuals with a medium time since limb loss (26-51 years). Initial tests on a Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W system validated the feasibility of real-time implementation with reduced sliding window sizes. These findings highlight the potential of bespoke machine learning approaches to enhance gesture recognition accuracy, contributing to the development of affordable, personalized prosthetic solutions for individuals with transradial amputations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.