ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
Optimization of care and recovery in older colorectal cancer surgery patients: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06752031 (Optimization of Care and Recovery in Older Colorectal Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimization of Care and Recovery in Older Colorectal Surgery Patients: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Study Protocol
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe exponential rise in colorectal cancer surgeries among older adults combined with 30-day readmission rates as high as 25% highlights the crucial need to optimize post-discharge care. While geriatrics surgery programs such as the Optimization of Senior Care and Recovery (OSCAR) model improve outcomes, they do not address the post-discharge transition. This study will address this gap by systematically integrating the OSCAR program with an evidence-based Care Transitions Intervention (CTI), using implementation science frameworks to guide adaptation. The resulting integrated model, OSCAR-S, will be evaluated in a pilot feasibility hybrid type 1 implementation-effectiveness trial.
methodsThis three-phase project will apply implementation science frameworks to adapt and test an integrated care transition model (OSCAR-S) for older colorectal surgery patients. The first phase involves qualitative interviews with stakeholders to inform the adaptation of the combined model (OSCAR-S), guided by the ADAPT, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and FRAME frameworks. Subsequently, we will determine an optimal implementation strategy, guided by the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). The final phase will include a pilot feasibility type I implementation-effectiveness trial. Guided by the RE-AIM framework and through a mixed methods approach, we will collect quantitative data from electronic medical records and qualitative data from post-implementation interviews to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. DISCUSSION: This study will offer insights into the adaptation, implementation, and assessment of an integrated care transition model (OSCAR-S) for older adults undergoing major colorectal surgery. The model integrates core components of two evidence-based interventions: OSCAR (geriatrics surgery co-management) and CTI (Care Transitions Intervention) programs. A novel aspect of this work is the application of multiple implementation science frameworks to guide this process. The findings will inform future strategies to optimize care transitions and postoperative outcomes, demonstrating how the implementation science approach can enhance the effectiveness and scalability of integrated care models.
trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT06752031 ). Registered December 30, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.