ArticleScientific reports2026
Elucidation of vaginal microbiota of women associated with bacterial vaginosis from Northern region of India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a prevalent vaginal dysbiosis that disproportionately affects women of reproductive age and is associated with adverse reproductive and sexual health outcomes. Despite its substantial global burden, diagnosis of BV remains challenging due to its polymicrobial nature, ecological complexity and lack of definitive biomarkers, contributing to recurrence rates exceeding 50%. Conventional diagnostic methods are intrinsically subjective and limited in capturing full taxonomic and ecological landscape of the vaginal microbiota. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively characterize the vaginal microbiota across BV-negative, BV-intermediate and BV-positive states in women from Northern India, using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We found that BV-positive women exhibited significantly greater microbial richness and diversity, marked by a shift from Lactobacillus-dominated communities to polymicrobial consortia enriched with Gardnerella, Sneathia, Prevotella, Atopobium, Megaspharea and Dialister. In contrast, BV-negative profiles were dominated by Lactobacillus, reflecting a stable eubiotic state, while BV-intermediate samples showed a transitional microbiota state. Differential abundance analysis revealed significant enrichment of BV-associated genera in dysbiotic states. Random Forest modeling identified Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Atopobium, Veillonellaceae, Sneathia, Prevotella as the top predictors of BV status. Functional predictions indicated enrichment of secondary metabolite biosynthesis and pathogen-associated pathways in BV-positive samples, suggesting a metabolically altered and dysbiotic vaginal environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.