ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of using different fundus cameras and image resolutions on automatic measurements of retinal vascular parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphological measurements of retinal vessel parameters are commonly obtained from fundus images using semi-automatic software packages. Since image quality, and image processing methods are potential sources of variation of such measurements, the aim of this study was to determine quantitatively the effect of using different fundus cameras and image resolutions on measurements of retinal vascular parameters. Fifty-four digital fundus images of 27 healthy subjects were acquired using two non-mydriatic cameras, Topcon TRC NW6S and Canon CR-2. Central retinal artery and vein equivalent (CRAE, CRVE), arteriolar and venular tortuosity (TortA and TortV) and fractal dimension (FD) were calculated using VAMPIRE software. First, VAMPIRE measurements were compared between Topcon images (3008 × 2000 pixels) and Canon images after resizing manually (CR2r, 3008 × 2000 px). The effect of different resolutions was studied using Canon images at full resolution (4147 × 2764 px, 100%) and then scaled at 83.8%, 75% and 50% in JPEG format using the dedicated Canon software. When comparing images acquired by CR2r and Topcon at the same resolution, all parameters were significantly affected. When using images with different resolutions from the same camera, significant increases of CRAE and CRVE and significant decreases of FD were found for decreasing resolutions. In conclusion, vascular measurements from images from different fundus cameras or at different resolutions are not, in general, directly comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.